Feasibility of text message follow-up for pediatric asthma care after an emergency department visit.

Background: Many children seen in the Emergency Department (ED) for asthma do not follow-up with their primary care provider. Text messaging via short message service (SMS) is a ubiquitous, but untested means of providing post-ED asthma follow-up care.Objective: To evaluate responses to an asthma assessment survey via SMS following an ED visit and estimate the likelihood of response by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: We recruited 173 parents of children 2-17 years-old presenting for ED asthma care to receive a follow-up text (participation rate: 85%). One month later, parents received via SMS a 22-item survey that assessed asthma morbidity. We assessed response rates overall and by various sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, including age, parental education, and indicators of asthma severity.Results: Overall, 55% of parents (n = 95) responded to the SMS survey. In multivariable logistic regression (MLR), parents who graduated high school had a four-fold higher response rate compared to parents with less than a high school degree (OR: 4.05 (1.62, 10.13)). More parents of children with oral steroid use in the prior 12 months responded to survey items (OR: 2.53 (1.2, 5.31)). Reported asthma characteristics included: 48% uncontrolled, 22% unimproved/worse, 21% with sleep disruption, and 10% who were hospitalized for asthma.Conclusions: Text messaging may be a viable strategy to improve post-ED asthma assessment and to identify children with persistent symptoms in need of enhanced care or modification of care plans.

Racial Inequities in Asthma Care.

Racial inequities in asthma care are evolving as a recognized factor in long-standing inequities in asthma outcomes (e.g., hospitalization and mortality). Little research has been conducted regarding the presence or absence of racial inequities among patients seen in asthma specialist settings, this is an important area of future research given that asthma specialist care is recommended for patients experiencing the poor asthma outcomes disproportionately experienced by Black and Hispanic patients. This study provides a systematic review of racial asthma care inequities in asthma epidemiology, clinical assessment, medication prescription, and asthma specialist referral practices.

Structural Inequities in Medicine that Contribute to Racial Inequities in Asthma Care.

Structural inequities in medicine have been present for centuries in the United States, but only recently are these being recognized as contributors to racial inequities in asthma care and asthma outcomes. This chapter provides a systematic review of structural factors such as racial bias in spirometry algorithms, the history of systemic racism in medicine, workforce/pipeline limitations to the presence of underrepresented minority health care providers, bias in research funding awards, and strategies to solve these problems.

Children with under-diagnosed asthma presenting to a pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Undiagnosed asthma in children presenting to the emergency department (ED) for respiratory illnesses might be associated with subsequent asthma morbidity and repeat ED visits. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of undiagnosed asthma among children presenting for ED care, and explore associations with sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: We surveyed parents of children ages 2-17 years seeking ED care for respiratory symptoms (including asthma) regarding sociodemographic characteristics, asthma symptoms, prior asthma care and morbidity, and prior asthma diagnosis. Undiagnosed asthma was defined as a positive screening for asthma and no prior diagnosis. We compared sociodemographic and clinical factors of those with diagnosed versus undiagnosed asthma using chi-square, t-tests and multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 362 children, 36% had undiagnosed asthma. Undiagnosed children were younger, had younger parents, and had parents less likely to speak English versus diagnosed children (all p < 0.05). Among undiagnosed children, 42% had moderate or severe asthma and 66% reported ≥1 exacerbation in the prior 12 months. Parent-reported controller medication use was higher among diagnosed versus undiagnosed children (60% vs. 21%, p=.001). In a multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for insurance, education, income and preferred language), no controller usage (aOR 4.26), no asthma exacerbations in the prior year (aOR 2.41) and younger age (aOR 0.76) were significantly associated with undiagnosed asthma. CONCLUSION: Children presenting to the ED with undiagnosed asthma commonly experience significant prior asthma morbidity. Strategies to improve asthma diagnosis and messaging to their parents may reduce future morbidity.

Use of a validated asthma questionnaire to increase inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in the pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Asthma guidelines recommend assessment of asthma control and treatment with an ICS when appropriate. Children seen for asthma in the ED often have poorly controlled asthma. Validated questionnaires are rarely used in the ED and ICS are prescribed at less than 5% of ED asthma encounters, leaving many children at risk for continued poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To determine if use of a validated asthma questionnaire can increase the proportion of children who receive an ICS prescription during an ED asthma visit. METHODS: We administered a validated asthma questionnaire (Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version [PACCI-ED]) to parents of children 2 - 17 years old presenting for asthma care at a large, urban, academic pediatric ED. Based on national asthma guidelines, the PACCI-ED results were used to determine ICS dose recommendations. ED physicians reviewed the PACCI-ED results and ICS dose recommendations and chose whether to prescribe an ICS upon discharge. ICS prescribing rates during the intervention period were assessed via medical record review and compared to historical controls. We also surveyed parents to examine the association of sociodemographic factors with receipt of an ICS prescription, and surveyed physicians regarding their prescribing decisions. RESULTS: Thirteen physicians and seventy-nine children participated. Historically, the ICS prescribing rate for asthma exacerbations discharged from the ED was 13%. The intervention increased ICS prescribing to 56% (p < 0.001). Children with ≥2 asthma exacerbations in the prior year (p < 0.02) and those with moderate-severe persistent asthma (p < 0.02) were more likely to receive an ICS prescription. There were no statistically significant differences in ICS prescribing by sociodemographic characteristics. CONCLUSION: A validated asthma questionnaire increased ICS prescribing for children presenting for to the ED for asthma care. Additional strategies are needed to promote prescribing in this setting and ensure that all eligible children receive guideline-based asthma care.

What Parents Want Doctors to Know: Responses to an Open-Ended Item on an Asthma Questionnaire.

OBJECTIVE: Unstructured parental comments could solicit important information about children's asthma, yet are rarely captured in clinical asthma questionnaires. This mixed-methods study describes parents' written responses to an open-ended question in a validated asthma questionnaire. METHODS: The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI) asthma questionnaire was administered to parents of children with asthma symptoms presenting to 48 pediatric primary care offices (PPCP), 1 pediatric pulmonology office, and 1 emergency department (ED). Responses to the question, "Please write down any concern or anything else you would like your doctor to know about your child's asthma" were analyzed using a phenomenological approach until thematic saturation was achieved for each site. Logistic regressions tested whether sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were associated with responding to the open-ended question. RESULTS: Of 7,988 parents who completed the PACCI, 954 (12%) responded to the open-ended question-2% in PPCP, 31% in the ED, and 50% in the pulmonary setting. More severe asthma was associated with higher odds of responding (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.84). Based on responses provided, we identified 3 communication types: 1) clarifying symptoms, 2) asking questions, and 3) communicating distress. Responses also covered 5 asthma-related themes: 1) diagnostic uncertainty, 2) understanding asthma etiology and prognosis, 3) medication management, 4) impact on child function, and 5) personal asthma characteristics. CONCLUSION: Parents of children with severe asthma provided clarifying details, asked questions, and relayed health concerns and distress. None of these topics may be easily captured by closed-ended asthma questionnaires.

Parental preferences for survey mode of administration, interview versus self-administered, with an asthma management questionnaire.

Background: National asthma guidelines encourage use of patient surveys to aid clinical assessment. Little is known about how these should be administered in acute care settings such as the emergency department (ED).Objective: Evaluate if parents have a preference for interview versus self-administered surveys in an ED, understand the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics by choice of survey mode of administration, and assess if there is a difference by mode in the parent's perception of an asthma management tool.Methods: A research assistant (RA) surveyed parents of children 2-17 years of age seeking ED asthma care. Parents chose to either self-administer or have an RA-administered survey that included the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument-ED version (PACCI-ED). We compared sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and perceptions about the PACCI-ED by mode of survey administration.Results: Of 174 parent participants, 60% chose interviewer-administered surveys. Parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys had lower income, lower educational attainment, and children with uncontrolled asthma (p < .05). Bivariate and multivariate analyses showed that parents who chose interviewer-administered versus self-administered surveys tended to rate the PACCI-ED more favorably.Conclusions: EDs wishing to systematically use an asthma survey may need to plan appropriate resources for staff to administer them, particularly if they serve populations of lower socioeconomic status.

Psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian version of the pediatric asthma control and communication instrument.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of questionnaires capable of evaluating the clinical control of Brazilian children and adolescents with asthma over a wide age range. The Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI) has been validated, but only with English- and Spanish-speaking children in the United States. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the PACCI questionnaire. METHODS: A cross-sectional psychometric study conducted with children and adolescents aged 01 to 19 years with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, and their respective parents/guardians. The following assessments were conducted: socioeconomic status; clinical control using the Childhood Asthma Control Test (c-ACT), Asthma Control Test (ACT); caregiver quality of life using the Pediatric Asthma Caregivers Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ); and pulmonary function test (spirometry). Validity was evaluated as follows: exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis; Cronbach's alpha analysis (α); floor and ceiling effects; receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: A total of 128 participants were included, most of them male (54.7%). The Brazilian version of PACCI had adequate internal consistency (α = .76) and moderate floor and ceiling effects. The internal structure presented acceptable adjustment indices, considering the extraction of four factors. The factors presented adequate α values. Asthma control factor 1 correlated with c-ACT/ACT and PACQLQ. Control domain scores greater than four points (sum of score) and above 1 point (problem index) were indicative of uncontrolled asthma. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian version of PACCI was able to provide valid and reliable measures in evaluating the clinical control of asthma in Brazilian children and adolescents.

Asthma specialist care preferences among parents of children receiving emergency department care for asthma.

Objective: To learn factors associated with desire for asthma specialist care among parents of children seeking emergency department (ED) care for asthma, and if referral was indicated based on national asthma guidelines. Methods: We surveyed parents of children ages 0-18 years seeking pediatric ED asthma care, then comparisons were made according to parental level of interest in asthma specialist care, with regard to socio-demographics, asthma morbidity and care, by chi-squared and logistic regression. Results: Of 149 children, 20% reported specialist care, but 75% met guideline criteria for referral. About 80% of parents not seeing an asthma specialist expressed a desire to see one. Higher rates of prior urgent care visits (48% vs. 22%, p = 0.03), ED visits (82% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and oral steroid use (53% vs. 22%, p = 0.009) were reported by parents who desired an asthma specialist compared with parents who did not. 87% of parents not seeing a specialist attributed this to a perceived lack of necessity by their primary care provider. An ED visit within the prior 12 months was the most significant predictor in parental desire for specialist care (odds ratio 9.75; 95% CI 3.42-27.76) in adjusted logistic regression models. Conclusion: High rates of parental preference for asthma specialist care suggest that directly querying parents may be an efficient method to identify children appropriate for specialist care in the ED.

Parent Perceptions of a Validated Asthma Questionnaire in the Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: While a number asthma questionnaires have been validated, most have not been used in an emergency department (ED) setting, nor evaluated patient feedback or clinical benefit. We sought to evaluate parent feedback on an asthma questionnaire used in an ED setting. METHODS: We recruited parents of children 2-17 years old presenting to a tertiary pediatric ED for asthma care. Parents first completed then rated the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (PACCI-ED). RESULTS: One hundred seventy-four parents (84%) completed surveys. Approximately two-thirds were Latinx, and 82% completed high school. Ninety-three percent of children had uncontrolled asthma. Parents endorsed the PACCI-ED: as easy to answer (94%); useful in understanding their child's asthma (83%); used the right words to describe their child's condition (95%); and would help the ED physician (93%) and primary care provider (PCP) (89%) better understand their child's asthma. Eleven percent reported that the PACCI-ED interfered with ED care. Parents with lower health literacy were more likely to agree the PACCI-ED asked more complete questions about their child's asthma than the ED physician (64% vs 45%, P = .02). Parents of children with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED should become part of regular ED care (88% vs 62%, P = .02). Parents were more likely to agree that the PACCI-ED would help their PCP understand their child's asthma if they had a lower income (92% vs 50%, P < .001), less education (100% vs 88%, P = .004), were Latinx (94% vs 83%, P = .006), or were not using controller medication (93% vs 83%, P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Parents endorse an asthma questionnaire as valuable during an ED encounter. Because it is endorsed to be valuable to parents, this questionnaire could be used to facilitate patient-centered asthma care.

Validation of Asthma Control Assessment Among Urban Adolescents Using the Asthma Control and Communication Instrument.

BACKGROUND: The National Institutes of Health guidelines recommend questionnaires to assess asthma control, but there are few self-reported asthma morbidity surveys validated among urban, African American, Hispanic, and/or poor adolescents. The Asthma Control and Communication Instrument (ACCI) is a 12-item self-reported questionnaire previously validated among a diverse adult population, but not among adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the ACCI to accurately describe asthma control in an urban adolescent population. METHODS: Between November 13, 2014, and March 2, 2017, we collected information using the ACCI, the Asthma Control Test, the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, and lung function among adolescents enrolled in a school-based asthma intervention study. The ACCI measure of asthma control was validated by evaluating accuracy (on the basis of receiver operating characteristic curve), internal reliability, and concurrent and discriminative validity. RESULTS: We collected information on 280 adolescents (mean age, 13.4 years; 56% males; and 51% African American). ACCI control showed good internal reliability and strong concurrent and discriminative validity with the Asthma Control Test and the Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. The accuracy of the ACCI in classifying adolescents with uncontrolled asthma was good (area under the curve, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.79-0.88). CONCLUSION: The ACCI, a clinical tool developed to assist communication about asthma control, has demonstrated strong construct validity as a self-reported questionnaire within an urban, African American, and Hispanic sample of adolescents. It has the potential to assist in the assessment of asthma control in urban, minority, and/or poor adolescents.

Predictors of prior asthma specialist care among pediatric patients seen in the emergency department for asthma.

Background: Asthma guidelines recommend specialist care for patients experiencing poor asthma outcomes during emergency department (ED) visits. The prevalence and predictors of asthma specialist care among an ED population seeking pediatric asthma care are unknown. Objective: To examine, in an ED population, factors associated with prior asthma specialist use based on parental reports of prior asthma morbidity and asthma care. Methods: Parents of children ages 0 to 17 years seeking ED asthma care were surveyed regarding socio-demographics, asthma morbidity, asthma management and current asthma specialist care status. We compared prior asthma care and morbidity between those currently cared for by an asthma specialist versus not. Multivariable logistic regression models to predict factors associated with asthma specialist use were adjusted for parent education and insurance type. Results: Of 150 children (62% boys, mean age 4.7 years, 69% Hispanic), 22% reported asthma specialist care, 75% did not see a specialist and for 3% specialist status was unknown. Care was worse for those not seeing a specialist, including under-use of controller medications (24% vs. 64%, p < 0.001) and asthma action plans (20% vs. 62%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that lack of recommendation by the primary care physician reduced the odds of specialist care (OR 0.01, 95% CI <0.01, 0.05, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Asthma specialist care was infrequent among this pediatric ED population, consistent with the sub-optimal chronic asthma care we observed. Prospective trials should further investigate if systematic referral to asthma specialists during/after an ED encounter would improve asthma outcomes.

Identifying Which Urban Children With Asthma Benefit Most From Clinician Prompting: Subgroup Analyses From the Prompting Asthma Intervention in Rochester-Uniting Parents and Providers (PAIR-UP) Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Clinician prompts increase the likelihood of guideline-recommended corrective actions (preventive medication prescription, dose change, and/or adherence promotion) for symptomatic children with poorly controlled or persistent asthma in the primary care setting, but it is unclear if all children equally benefit. The objectives of this study were to identify whether asthma severity, visit type, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions during visits for children with symptomatic asthma, and determine whether these factors modified the effect of a prompting intervention. METHODS: We conducted prespecified subgroup analyses of a cluster randomized controlled trial of physician prompting that promoted guideline-based asthma management for urban children with symptomatic asthma. We tested predictors of corrective actions with bivariate and multivariate multilevel logistic regressions, compared intervention effects across factor categories via stratified analyses, and characterized effect modification with interaction term analyses. RESULTS: Prompting intervention exposure, moderate/severe disease, asthma-focused visits, and current preventive medication use were predictive of corrective actions. The prompting intervention significantly increased the rate of corrective actions for children across categories of disease severity, visit type, and preventive medication use. However, the intervention effect was significantly smaller for children already using a preventive medication (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.38) compared with children without preventive medication use (adjusted OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 3.39-11.54). CONCLUSIONS: Prompting increases the likelihood of corrective actions during clinic encounters; however, children already using preventive medication benefit less. It is critical for providers to recognize the need for corrective actions among these symptomatic children.

Feasibility of Picture-Based Asthma Medication Plans in Urban Pediatric Outpatient Clinics.

Picture-based Asthma Action Plans show promise for overcoming parental literacy barriers and improving child asthma outcomes, but it is uncertain how parents respond to pictures of specific medications, which may be particularly important for improving disease self-management. Thus, we assessed parent attitudes toward an asthma-related picture-based medication plan (PBMP) in an urban academic pediatric clinic and examined attitudes by literacy level. Surveys were administered to a convenience sample of parents of children presenting to an urban pediatric pulmonary clinic for asthma consultation between March and August 2011. The Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine-Short Form (REALM-SF) was administered to parents. Parents indicated their level of agreement with 9 statements on the potential usefulness of the PBMP: (1) before being shown a PBMP; and (2) after seeing the doctor. McNemar's tests showed that the proportion of high-literate parents (≥9th grade reading level) who endorsed the potential benefits of the PBMP after the clinical encounter was significantly higher than before the clinical encounter. A high proportion of low-literate parents (<9th grade reading level) consistently endorsed the PBMP before and after the clinical encounter. Among a diverse sample seen in an urban asthma clinic, parents of all literacy levels endorse PBMPs as useful, especially after using them in clinical encounters.

Predicting future emergency department visits and hospitalizations for asthma using the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument - Emergency Department version (PACCI-ED).

OBJECTIVE: Emergency departments (EDs) are potential settings for interventions to improve asthma outcomes. Screening tools can identify children at risk of future morbidity. Our objective was to determine the predictive validity of the Pediatric Asthma Control and Communication Instrument - Emergency Department version (PACCI-ED) for future asthma-related ED visits and hospitalizations. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 108 children 1-17 years old who visited an ED for asthma and completed the PACCI-ED. The PACCI-ED queries parents about prior 12-month ED visits, hospitalizations, steroid use, perceived asthma morbidity and burden, and asthma control (over prior 1-2 weeks). The primary outcome was subsequent ED visits and hospitalizations within 1 year of enrollment. Poisson regression was used to model PACCI-ED questions for future ED visits controlling for age and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Reported ED visits predicted future ED visits (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) 3.1, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-7.2) but not future hospitalizations. Reported hospitalizations predicted future ED visits (aIRR 3.3; 95% CI 1.7-6.3) and hospitalizations (aIRR 6.4; 95% CI 2.3-17.6). The remaining PACCI-ED questions did not predict future ED visits or hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The PACCI-ED risk domain was the only domain that predicted future asthma ED visits and hospitalizations. Questions about previous ED visits and hospitalizations are the most effective questions when screening children with asthma in EDs for the risk of future health-care use.

Racial Disparities in Asthma Morbidity Among Pediatric Patients Seeking Asthma Specialist Care.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate whether there may be a higher morbidity threshold for African American versus white children to be referred to or seek asthma specialist care. METHODS: Secondary analysis of registry data captured from children presenting for an initial routine outpatient asthma consultation. Parents completed standard survey instruments, and spirometry was conducted when deemed appropriate by the provider. RESULTS: Wilcoxon rank sum tests revealed that African American patients had been hospitalized twice as often and admitted to the intensive care unit or intubated significantly more than 1½ times more frequently than their white patient counterparts. t tests indicated African American patients' forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percentage predicted was significantly worse than that of whites, but there was no significant difference for FEV1/forced vital capacity ratio. t tests suggested that African American patients had statistically worse asthma control than did white patients at the time of initial presentation to the pulmonologist, but there was no difference in the distribution of asthma severity categories. Multivariate regression models indicated that racial differences in parent education did not explain the disparities in asthma morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: African American patients had significantly worse asthma morbidity than their white counterparts, including higher rates of hospitalization and intensive care unit admission and poorer lung functioning. Given that receipt of asthma specialist care can improve those outcomes that are disparately experienced by African American children, methods of increasing their access to and use of asthma specialist care need to be developed.